High CourtsSingle Bench

Shankar Pal vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 24 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 MP CK 0204

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 294, 302, 323, 506
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.51474 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

15 paragraphs · 279 words

Rajeev Kumar Dubey, J

Heard with the aid of case diary.

This is the first application under Section 439 Cr.P.C for grant of bail. Applicant Shankar Pal was arrested on 6/9/2020 in connection with Crime

No.831/2020 registered at Police Station Piplani, Distt Bhopal (M.P.) for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 294, 506 and 302 of IPC.

As per prosecution story, on 27/8/2020 at 10.30 p.m. applicant assaulted his father deceased Mahadev Pal by kicks and fists due to which he

sustained head injury and died during treatment on 3/9/2020.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the offence. Even otherwise, only allegation

against the applicant is that he assaulted the deceased by kicks and fists. The alleged incident is said to have occurred on 27/8/2020 and deceased

discharged from the hospital on 2/9/2020, thereafter he died on 3/9/2020, so it can not be said that the deceased died due to injuries sustained by him in

the incident. The applicant is in custody since 6/9/2020. Charge sheet has been filed and the conclusion of trial will take time, hence prayed for release

of the applicant on bail.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the prayer and submitted that in the postmortem report clearly mentioned that

deceased Mahadev died due to head injury and that injury was sustained by him in the said incident so, he should not be released on bail.

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and contention of learned counsel for the State, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the

applicant. Hence, the bail application is rejected.