AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
11 paragraphs · 132 wordsAmbuj Nath, J
This interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the legal heirs of the opposite party no. 2-Ashok Samanta, informing this court that opposite party no. 2-Ashok Samanta died on 12.02.2021during the pendency of this revision application. It has been prayed that following legal heirs may be substituted in place of the deceased opposite party no. 2.
i. Kalpana (Samanto) Devi (wife)
ii. Ranjeet Samanto (son)
iii. Sudhir Samanto (son)
iv. Chotan Samanto (Son)
v. Prabhakar Samanto (Son)
vi. Mala Goswami (Married daughter)
vii. Mitali Goswami (Married daughter)
Learned lawyer appearing on behalf of the petitioner is directed to file an interlocutory application seeking substitution of the aforesaid legal heirs in place of the deceased opposite party no. 2.
Accordingly, this interlocutory application stands disposed of.
