AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
9 paragraphs · 453 wordsSubodh Abhyankar, J
They are heard and perused the challan papers.
This is applicant's second application under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (482 of BNSS) for grant of anticipatory bail, as he/she is apprehending their arrest in connection with Crime No.185/2021, registered at Police Station - Jawad, District -Neemuch (MP) for offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 34, 323, 342, 506 & 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Applicant's first anticipatory bail application-M.Cr.C.no.25785/2021 was allowed by this Court on 12.01.2023.
Counsel for the applicant has submitted that subsequently after filing of the charge sheet, a charge under Section 307 of the IPC has also been added, hence the applicant is again apprehending her arrest and the application filed before the trial court has also been rejected on the ground that Section 307 of the IPC has been added as it has been found that the injured woman fell from the window of the house, as a result of which she is still in coma. Counsel has drawn the attention of this Court to the various WhatsApp chats between the injured and her husband to submit that they were having cordial relationship. Thus, it is submitted that the application be allowed as the custodial interrogation of the applicant would not be necessary.
Counsel for the respondent / State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer.
On due consideration of the rival submissions and perusal of the documents filed on record, and the fact that the applicant is already enjoying the liberty as the anticipatory bail was earlier allowed by this Court on 12.1.2023 and Section 307 of the IPC has been added subsequently; whereas there is no other change in circumstance or new discovery, and in such circumstances, and also taking note of various WhatsApp chats filed on record, this Court is of the considered opinion that the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary in the present case. In view of the same, applicant has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, this application is allowed. It is directed that in the event of arrest, applicant -Shakuntala Soni shall be released on bail, upon his/her executing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (rupees Twenty five thousand only) and furnishing one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (Investigating Officer).
The applicant shall make himself/herself available for interrogation by a Police Officer, as and when required. He/she shall further abide by the other conditions enumerated in Sub Section (2) of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The M.Cr.C. stands allowed and disposed of. Certified copy as per rules.
