High CourtsSingle Bench

Shantanu Kumar Saini vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 24 December 2024 · Citation: (2024) 12 UK CK 0084

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Kumar Verma, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 2(vii-a), 2(xxiii-a), 8, 21, 60
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 2492 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 296 words

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1.

Present Application has been filed for grant of regular bail in the Case Crime No. 125 of 2024, registered at police station Shyampur, District Haridwar.

2.

The applicant - Shantanu Kumar Saini is in judicial custody for the offence under Section 8/21/60 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3.

The police party apprehended the applicant - accused on 20.11.2024 and recovered 29 grams of smack from his possession.

4.

Heard Ms. Medha Pande, learned counsel for applicant and Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General for respondent.

5.

Ms. Medha Pande, Advocate, has contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present matter. Nothing was recovered from his possession. The recovered article is less than commercial quantity. Applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He is a permanent resident of District Bijnor, therefore, there is no likelihood of his absconding.

6.

Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General, has opposed the Bail Application orally.

7.

As per Table prepared under Section 2(xx iii - a) and Section 2(vii- a) of the said Act, 1985, lesser than 5 grams of Smack (Heroin) is small quantity and greater than 250 grams of Smack is commercial quantity (Entry No. 56).

8.

Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.

9.

The Bail Application is allowed.

10.

Let the applicant - Shantanu Kumar Saini be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.