AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
10 paragraphs · 487 wordsKuldeep Mathur, J
This application for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.85/2023, registered at Police Station Obri, District Dungarpur, for offences under Sections 363, 366, 344, 376(2) IPC and Section 5/6 of the POCSO Act.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
This Court vide order dated 16.01.2024 directed the learned Public Prosecutor to procure the case diary. In compliance of the said order, the case diary was produced before this Court.
From perusal of the case diary, this Court finds that the victim ‘K’ who was aged about 17 years one month, in her statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has stated that she remained in the house of the present petitioner for about one year out of her free will and volition . The victim ‘K’ in her statements has not levelled any allegation of forcible sexual assault against the present petitioner.
From perusal of the case diary, it is further evident that the victim ‘K’ in her statements recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has levelled specific allegation of forcible sexual assault against one Mukesh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner who is aged about 23 years is in judicial custody since 12.12.2023 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and submitted that looking to the seriousness of the accusations levelled against the petitioner, he does not deserve to be enlarged on bail.
Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, this Court prima facie finds that the victim ‘K’ who is aged about 17 years one month, in her statements recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. has stated that she voluntarily remained in the house of the present petitioner for about one year. This Court also prima facie finds that the victim ‘K’ in her statements recorded under Sections 161 & 164 Cr.P.C. has not levelled any allegation of forcible sexual assault – rape against the present petitioner. Per contra, specific allegation of forcible sexual assault has been levelled against one Mukesh. Thus, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Shanti Lal S/o Valma arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.85/2023, registered at Police Station Obri, District Dungarpur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.
