High CourtsSingle Bench

Sharafat Ali vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 April 2024 · Citation: (2024) 04 UK CK 0140

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Uttar Pradesh Gangsters And Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 — Section 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi), 3
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 743 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 152 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant Sharafat Ali is in judicial custody in Case Crime No.40 of 2024, under Sections 2(b)(i), 2(b)(xi)/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Shyampur, District- Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that in all the cases, based on which the instant FIR has been lodged, the applicant is on bail.

4.

Learned State Counsel admits this fact.

5.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6.

The bail application is allowed.

7.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.