High CourtsSingle Bench

Sharvan Ram Bishnoi vs Nathmal Didel And Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 10 August 2023 · Citation: (2023) 08 RAJ CK 0037

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Mehta, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Contempt No. 457 Of 2023 In Civil Writ Petition No. 2713 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 121 words

Dinesh Mehta, J

1.

By way of the present contempt petition, the petitioner has sought proceedings for contempt, as the respondents have not allowed the petitioner to join his duties pursuant to the interim order passed by this Court.

2.

Mr. Purohit, learned counsel for the respondent – State submitted that the petitioner has been allowed to join his duties.

3.

In view of the aforesaid, this Court is not inclined to continue with the proceedings of contempt.

4.

The contempt petition is hereby dismissed.

5.

Needless to observe that the petitioner shall be free to avail his remedies for the salary, which has not been paid to him for the intervening period during which he was not allowed to join.