High CourtsSingle Bench

Sharwan Kumar Suthar vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 7 March 2024 · Citation: (2024) 03 RAJ CK 0017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 379, 401, 451
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 344 Of 2024
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 532 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The petitioner has filed this criminal revision petition under Section 397 & 401 Cr.P.C. to assail the impugned judgment dated 28.02.2024 passed by Learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases, Bhilwara whereby the learned trial Court rejected the application under Section 451 Cr.P.C., moved by the petitioner for releasing the vehicle Swift Dezire VDI Car having registration No.RJ 23 CA 8379.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in support of his arguments, has placed reliance on a decision of the co-ordinate Bench of this Court rendered at Jaipur Bench in Prakash Chand Vs. State of Rajasthan reported in 2010(1) Cr.L.R.(Raj.) 507. In the aforesaid judgment, the vehicle and other articles were seized from the accused for carrying contraband of small quantity just above the commercial quantity. It is in that background, the Court has acceded to the prayer of the incumbent and recorded its finding that solely for the reason that the vehicle and other articles are likely to be confiscated after trial, conditional release of the vehicle and other articles on Supurdginama and surety cannot be denied and interim custody of the vehicle and other articles can be granted to the incumbent on certain conditions. Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai Vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2002 (10) SCC 283 and co- ordinate Bench of this Court at Jaipur Bench in case of Prakash Chand (supra) has held that conditional release of the vehicle cannot be denied.

Accordingly, the instant revision petition is allowed and the order dated 28.02.2024 is hereby quashed and set aside and the vehicle Swift Dezire VDI Car having registration No.RJ 23 CA 8379 in question is ordered to be released on ‘supardgi’ till the completion of the trial upon following conditions:-

(a) the petitioner furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.4.,00,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.2,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court undertaking to produce the car in the Court as and when required to do so.

(b) the petitioner shall get the Swift Dezire VDI Car having registration No.RJ 23 CA 8379 photographed showing the registration number as well as the chassis number. Such photograph shall be taken in the presence of the Investigating Officer, to be kept on the file of the case.

(c) the personal bonds of the petitioner and bonds of sureties shall carry the photographs of the petitioner and his sureties and the bond of sureties shall further carry the photograph of perhaps identifying them before the Court which is with full residential particulars of the sureties and the persons identifying them.

(d) the petitioner shall undertake not to transfer the ownership of the Swift Dezire VDI Car having registration No.RJ 23 CA 8379 and not to lease it to anyone and not to make or allow any changes in it to be made so as to make unidentifiable.

(e) the petitioner will not allow the Swift Dezire VDI Car having registration No.RJ 23 CA 8379 to be used for any antisocial activities including for the purpose of carrying narcotics which may constitute offence under the NDPS Act.”