Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Shashikala vs Union Of India & Others

Central Administrative Tribunal · Decided on 30 June 2021 · Citation: (2021) 06 CAT CK 0077

HON’BLE JUDGES
A Mukhopadhaya, Member (A)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Original Application No. 332, 00165 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 382 words

A Mukhopadhaya, Member (A)

1.

Shri Santosh Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, is not present and sent a telephonic message even as the case, having been passed over

once, was called again, stating that he is unable to attend court proceedings as he is in some difficulty and therefore seeks an adjournment. In these

circumstances, Shri Ashutosh Pathak, learned counsel for the respondents, while accepting notice for the respondents, sought to assist the Court in this

matter and suggested that since the applicant has made a representation to the respondents on 16.04.2021 for compassionate appointment in this case,

(Annexure-2), and has also expressed some apprehension of adverse developments if this matter is not addressed promptly, the same can perhaps be

addressed if this representation is decided by way of a reasoned and speaking order. He further stated that in case the representation is to be decided

after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the applicant, a period of at least two months would be necessary for disposal of the same.

2.

Record of the case was perused. It is observed that the applicant has indeed made a representation on 16.04.2021 for compassionate appointment,

(Annexure - 2), and has also expressed an apprehension, (in the OA), that in case her application is not considered timely, some other party may be

given the appointment to which she feels she is rightfully entitled as per law.

3.

Looking to the aforementioned circumstances as well as the suggestions made by the learned counsel for the respondents, I deem it appropriate, in

the interests of justice and without entering into the merits of the case, to dispose of this OA at the admission stage itself with a direction to the

respondents to consider the representation made to them on 16.04.2021, (Annexure -2), and after affording an opportunity of a personal hearing to the

applicant, pass a reasoned and speaking order on the same in accordance with law and convey this to the applicant within a period of two months

from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

4.

Original Application is disposed of accordingly.

5.

There will be no order on costs.

6.

A copy of this order may also be sent to the learned counsel for the parties by e-mail.