AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 309 wordsMohammed Nias C.P., J
This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking regular bail.
The petitioner is the first accused in Crime No.1368/2023 of Kunnamkulam Police Station, Thrissur District, for having committed offences punishable under Sections 323, 324, 294(b), 308 & 506(ii) r/w section 334 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case is that on 18.09.2023 at 8 p.m., at Chirackal Pengamuck, the accused persons 1 to 3 approached the defacto complainant while he was talking to his native one Asharaf due to prior enmity towards them as Asharaf gave a complaint to Kunnamkulam Police against A2 and A3, possessed with an iron rod and sword stick and A1 uttered obscene words and chopped on the right side of the defacto complainant with the sword stick and inflicted injuries to him and when the defacto complainant fell down A2 beat on his neck with an iron rod, and A3 hit on his chest with an iron weapon. When A1 attempted to chop again, the defacto complainant pushed and evaded that attack timely, or else, it would have resulted in his death, thereby committing the above offence.
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would say that the petitioner is totally innocent and falsely implicated with ulterior motives. At any rate, he points out that the petitioner has been in custody since 19/09/2023, and continued custody of the petitioner is unnecessary.
The Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
Considering the injuries inflicted as seen from the wound certificate, five other antecedents of the petitioner, the fact that recovery of the weapon has not been effected so far, and the fact that the other accused are not yet arrested, I am not inclined to grant bail at this stage.
The bail application is accordingly dismissed.
