AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
45 paragraphs · 413 words1.The petitioner herein is the respondent in M.C.No.65 of
2015 on the file of the Family Court, Muvattupuzha. The
said petition has been instituted by the respondents
herein under Section 125(1) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure seeking maintenance.
By order dated 30.6.2016, the aforesaid petition was
allowed ex parte and the petitioner has been directed to
pay a sum of Rs.3,000/- as maintenance to the 1st
respondent and a sum of Rs.2,000/- to the 2nd respondent,
who is the minor child of the petitioner.
According to the petitioner, he had appeared before the
court below and the matter was initially referred for
mediation. Under the premise that the matter had been
settled, the petitioner did not appear before the trial court
and hence he was set ex parte and the order was passed.
It is further submitted that the court below has not taken
note of the fact that the 1st respondent was not a person
who was unable to maintain herself. In so far as the
maintenance ordered to the 2nd respondent is concerned,
no serious contention is raised.
Though various other contentions are advanced, the fact
remains that the petitioner has not approached the court
below for setting aside the ex parte order. I am of the
view that it is for the petitioner to approach the Family
Court and file appropriate application to set aside the ex
parte order and for consideration of the matter afresh.
It is submitted by the petitioner that he was arrested in
enforcement of the execution order and that he has
already been deposited a sum of Rs.35,000/- before the
court below.
Having regard to the facts, I direct the petitioner to
deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- before the Family Court
within a period of three weeks from today. If the amount
is deposited and an application under Section 126(2) of
the Code is filed along with an application to condone the
delay before the court below, the court below shall
consider the same and pass appropriate orders on its
merits. Till such time, coercive proceedings shall be kept
in abeyance. Until final orders are passed, the petitioner
shall pay and continue to pay fifty percent of the
maintenance ordered to the respondents by the impugned
order. The respondents herein shall be entitled to file an
application seeking release of the amount. If such an
application is filed, the amount shall be released forthwith.
This petition is disposed off.
