AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 422 wordsP. Sam Koshy, J
The applicant has preferred this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No. 141/2018 registered at Police Station Mohannagar, District Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 457, 380, 34 of IPC.
Present applicant is in jail since 24/09/2018.
The case of the prosecution is that the present applicant is said to have committed theft in the house at Durg at Saket Colony and stolen cash, gold and silver ornaments and four mobiles worth Rs. 16.70 lakhs.
The counsel for the applicant submits that it is case where in which only for the reason of implicating the applicant in the said offence is memorandum of statement of the co-accused Vikas Naiya @ Tapan. According to the counsel for the applicant except for the memorandum of statement of the co-accused, there is no other incriminating material collected in the course of investigation, so far as the present applicant is concerned. Therefore, contention of the petitioner is that though an amount of Rs. 5000/- has been recovered from his possession but the same also has not been either identified or established that it was the same money which was stolen from the house of the complainant.
The State counsel however opposing the bail application submits that, since the case of the co-accused Vikas Naiya @ Tapan already been rejected by this Court, thus present bail application also deserves to be rejecrted. He further submits that the nature of the offence and the manner in which crime was committed would not entitle the applicant bail.
Having heard the contentions put forth on either side and on perusal of record, particularly taking into consideration the submission by the State counsel who submits that except for the memorandum of statement of the co-accused Vikas Naiya @ Tapan and the alleged recovery of 5000/- from the possession of the applicant, there is no other material available implicating the applicant for the said offence. Thus, this Court is of the opinion that prima-facie, a strong case has been made out for grant of bail to the present applicant.
Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is ordered that the applicant shall be released on bail on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court. The applicant shall thereafter appear before the Trial Court on each and every date given by the said court.
