High CourtsSingle Bench

Sher Mohmmad alias Sheru vs State of Uttaranchal

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 17 May 2002 · Citation: (2002) 2 UC 66

HON’BLE JUDGES
Irshad Hussain, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 357 of 2002

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 141 words

Irshad Hussain, J.—Heard the Learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

2.

Applicant-accused was not named in the FIR and according to the prosecution, stolen ornaments have been recovered from his possession. The details of the ornaments were not given in the F.I.R. and till the statement of the complainant was recorded after three days u/s 161 of Cri. P.C. no detail of the ornaments was submitted to the Investigating Officer. Considering this aspect. I find it a fit case for bail.

3.

Let the applicant Sher Mohmmad alias Sheru son of Sri Rasheed, R/o Bamanwala, P S. Kotwali, District Dehradun be released on bail in case crime No. 30 of 2002 under Sections 395, 397, 412 of I.P. C, P.S. Dalanwala, District Dehradun on his ling a person bond and adequate sureties to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Dehradun.