High CourtsSingle Bench

Sher Singh @ Sonu vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 21 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 P&H CK 0173

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ramendra Jain, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 173(2), 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 148, 149, 323, 324, 326, 427, 452, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous -M- No. 40300 of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 346 words

Through this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C., petitioner-Sher Singh @ Sonu, has prayed for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 195 dated

20.06.2018 registered under Sections 323, 324, 427, 452, 506, 148 and 149 IPC (Section 326 IPC added later on) at Police Station City Khanna,

District Ludhiana.

Learned counsel for complainant-Jagtar Singh has filed memo of appearance on his own, though he has not been impleaded as party. The same is

taken on record. Office to tag the same at the appropriate place.

According to the prosecution, in the intervening night of 19/20.06.2018, some unidentified persons armed with deadly weapons like baseball bats,

swords etc. attacked complainant-Jagtar Singh and caused injuries, including grievous one falling under Section 326 IPC with their respective weapons

on different parts of his body.

Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that the petitioner was not named in the FIR. Co-accused of the petitioner, namely; Manpreet

Singh @ Mani, Manjinder Singh @ Mau and Gurjit Singh @ Goldy, having similar role have been granted regular bail by this Court vide orders dated

29.08.2018, 12.09.2018 and 20.09.2018 in CRM-M Nos. 35808, 38707 and 40122-2018, respectively. Petitioner is in custody since 23.06.2018. Thus,

treating the case of the petitioner on the same parity, he may be granted the concession of regular bail, considering the fact that filing of final report

under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C. and conclusion of trial may take a long time. No useful purpose would be served by detaining him in jail.

On the other hand, learned State counsel vehemently opposed the above submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner.

Considering overall facts and circumstances, but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the petition is allowed. Consequently,

petitioner-Sher Singh @ Sonu, is ordered to be released on bail pending trial, treating his case on the same parity as that of his co-accused, namely;

Manpreet Singh @ Mani, Manjinder Singh @ Mau and Gurjit Singh @ Goldy, on his furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction

of Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.