High CourtsSingle Bench

Shibin @ Anikuttan vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 March 2023 · Citation: (2023) 03 KL CK 0024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bechu Kurian Thomas, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 482 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 143, 147, 148, 149, 294(b), 323, 324, 447
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 1348 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 343 words

Bechu Kurian Thomas, J

1.

Petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash all proceedings against him.

2.

Petitioner is the 3rd accused in C.C.No.2253/2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal, arising out of Crime No.124/2014 of Pothencode Police Station, registered for the offences under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 447, 323, 324 and Section 294(b) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the defacto complainants.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents, apart from the learned Public Prosecutor.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has been settled and hence the proceedings against the petitioner ought to be quashed. It was also submitted that, considering the nature of offences alleged, no purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings.

5.

In Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Another [(2012) 10 SCC 303], the Apex Court has held that in appropriate cases, the High Court can take note of the amicable resolution of disputes between the victim and the wrongdoer to put an end to the criminal proceedings. This view was reiterated in Narinder Singh and Others v. State of Punjab and Another [(2014) 6 SCC 466] and Yogendra Yadav and Others v. State of Jharkhand and Another [(2014) 9 SCC 653].

6.

I have perused Annexure-A4 and Annexure-A5 affidavits filed by respondents 2 and 3. The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that upon verification, it is understood that the affidavits are genuine, and the defacto complainants stand by the contents thereof. I am satisfied that the matter has been settled and no public interest is involved in this case. There is no impediment for granting the prayer for quashing. The continuance of the proceedings will only be an exercise in futility.

7.

Accordingly, all proceedings against the petitioner C.C.No.2253/2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Attingal, arising out of Crime No.124/2014 of Pothencode Police Station, are quashed.

This Crl.M.C is allowed as above.