AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
15 paragraphs · 284 wordsThis petition is filed by the respondent in O.P. No. 373 of 2020 on the file of the Family Court, Vadakara seeking transfer of the said O.P. to Family
Court, Kozhikode.
The petitioner is the wife of the respondent herein. The Original Petition was filed by the respondent herein before the Family Court, Vadakara for
restitution of conjugal rights.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner along with her minor daughter is residing at Kozhikode. It is also submitted
that the petitioner has also moved the Family Court, Kozhikode seeking maintenance. Such being the case, it will be extremely difficult for her to
attend the court proceedings before the Family Court, Vadakara.
Inspite of service of notice on the respondent, he has not turned up.
It is well settled that in matrimonial disputes, while considering transfer petitions, the convenience of the wife is to be preferred over the
convenience of the husband. (See Sumita Singh v. Kumar Sanjay (2002 KHC 1889), Sailaja V v. V. Koteswara Rao (2003 KHC 3105) and Rajani
Kishor Pardeshi v. Kishor Babulal Pardeshi ((2005) 12 SCC 237). When the factum of convenience of the parties is considered, it tilts in favour of the
wife. Based on the facts and circumstances of parties, I deem it appropriate and expedient for ends of justice to entertain the request of the petitioner.
Therefore, this transfer petition is allowed and O.P. No.373 of 2020 pending before the Family Court, Vadakara is withdrawn and transferred to
Family Court, Kozhikode. The learned Judge, Family Court, Vadakara shall transmit the records after fixing a date for appearance of the parties
before the Family Court, Kozhikode.
