High CourtsSingle Bench

Shinder Singh vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 December 2020 · Citation: (2020) 12 P&H CK 0019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Raj Mohan Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Narcotic Drugs And Psychotroic Substantes Act, 1985 — Section 15, 25
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 31849 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

25 paragraphs · 469 words

Raj Mohan Singh, J

The case has been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C in case bearing FIR No.79 dated 06.08.2018, registered under Sections 15 and 25 of

the NDPS Act, 1985 at Police Station Mehna District Moga.

Allegations are that the petitioner along with Buta Singh escorted the truck in which co-accused Dharamjit Singh, Gurvir Singh and Jagdev Singh @

Deban were bringing poppy husk. Petitioner was not arrested from the spot. Co-accused Jagdev Singh @ Deban also succeeded in fleeing from the

spot. Jagdev Singh @ Deban filed CRM-M No.16994 of 2019 in which Co-ordinate Bench of this Court was pleased to grant regular bail to him vide

order dated 09.05.2019.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that nothing has been recovered from the petitioner.

Per contra, learned State counsel on instructions from the SI Sukhwinder Singh submitted that the petitioner is involved in the case where 7200 kgs. of

poppy husk was recovered from the truck at the spot. Petitioner along with co-accused Buta Singh was escorting the truck in a car, though he has not

been apprehended from the spot, but his complicity is writ large on the face of the record. Petitioner is having antecedent behaviour of criminal

activities. Petitioner has been involved in number of cases. In some of the case, he has been convicted also.

As against this learned counsel for the petitioner again submitted that in the present case nothing has been recovered from the petitioner. He is in

custody since 26.08.2018. He was not the occupant of the truck. The alleged involvement of the petitioner in other cases cannot be ground to discard

the prayer of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in the present case in view of Criminal Appeal No.154 of 2020 (arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.)

No.9209 of 2019) titled ' Prabhakar Tiwari vs. State of U.P. & Anr.' decided by the Hon'ble Apex Court on 24.01.2020. Since no prosecution witness

has been examined so far, therefore, owing to the situation arising out of COVID-19 pandemic, the trial of the case may take some time in its

culmination.

At this stage, without adverting to the merits of the case, keeping in view the stage of trial, particularly in view of regular bail granted to the co-

accused and in view of the situation arising out of COVID-19 pandemic, I deem it appropriate to grant regular bail to the petitioner, who is in custody

since 26.08.2018.

In view of above, petition is allowed. Petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to his furnishing heavy bail bonds/surety bonds to the

satisfaction of the trial Court/concerned Duty Magistrate.

Nothing expressed hereinabove would be construed to be an expression of any opinion on merits of the case.