High Courts

Shiu Suhai Mullic vs Lala Hari Suhai Sing and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 1 September 1869 · Citation: (1869) 09 CAL CK 0039

CASE NUMBER
Special Appeal No. 1425 of 1869
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 101 words

Macpherson, J.—I think this special appeal ought to be dismissed because the lower appellate Court was right in holding, as it did, that as the plaintiff sought to establish his right of pre-emption upon the ground of partnership, he could not properly get a decree on the ground of vicinage. Therefore, without going into the substantial question of law which is raised, and following the precedent which is to be found established in the case of Koonj Behari Lal v. Giridhari Lal 1 B.L.R. S.N. 12, I would dismiss this appeal with costs.

Glover, J.

I am of the same opinion.