AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
21 paragraphs · 335 wordsÂ
S.K. Sahoo, J
1.This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Inspector of Nabarangpur P.S. Case No. 212 of 2020 corresponding to T.R.
Case No. 26 of 2020 pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Nabarangpur for alleged commission of offence under
section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
The bail application of the petitioner has been rejected by the learned Sessions Judge -cum- Special Judge, Nabarangpur as per order dated
07.12.2020.
Considering the submission made by the learned counsel that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.09.2020, charge sheet has already been
submitted under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act and the quantity of contraband Ganja stated to have been seized from the possession of the
petitioner and the co-accused Deepak Kumar Singh is 16.5 kilograms (sixteen kilograms and five hundred grams), which is lesser than commercial
quantity and therefore, the bar under section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable and on hearing the learned counsel for the State, I am inclined to
release the petitioner on bail.
Let the petitioner be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent
sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin over the matter with further conditions as the learned Court may
deem just and proper.
The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.
As the restrictions due to resurgence of COVID-19 situation are continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a printout of the order
available in the High Court’s website, at par with certified copy, subject to attestation by the concerned advocate, in the manner prescribed vide
Court’s Notice No. 4587 dated 25th March 2020 as modified by Court’s Notice No. 4798 dated 15th April 2021.
