High CourtsSingle Bench

Shoaib vs State Of Uttarakhand And Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 25 March 2025 · Citation: (2025) 03 UK CK 0922

HON’BLE JUDGES
Pankaj Purohit, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 323, 504, 506
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Application U/s 482 No. 912 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 422 words

Pankaj Purohit, J

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

By means of the present C482 application, the applicant has put to challenge charge-sheet/ challani report dated 16.11.2020, summoning/ cognizance order dated 27.07.2021 passed by the learned Principle Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Haridwar in Criminal Case No.107 of 2021 State Vs. Shoaib, under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC (Case Crime No.368 of 2020) as well as the entire proceedings of the aforesaid criminal case.

3.

Along with the present C482 application, a joint compounding application (IA/2/2024) is filed duly supported by separate affidavits by applicant and respondent No.2.

4.

In the compounding application, it has been stated by the parties that the dispute has been settled amicably between them and now there is no dispute between the parties and the respondent No.2 does not want to pursue with the case anymore.

5.

Applicant-Shoaib and respondent No.2-Arif are present before this Court. Both the parties are duly identified by their respective counsels. On interaction, respondent No.2 stated that he wants to end the matter and after intervention of the family members, he has decided to settle the matter full and final with the applicants.

6.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the parties are family members and now, when the matter is amicably settled by the parties after intervention of the family members, it would be futile exercise to keep this matter pending.

7.

Learned State Counsel and learned counsel for the respondent No.2 have no objection if the matter is compounded.

8.

Having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the compounding application as well as the documents available on record, this Court is of the view that if the parties do not wish to pursue with the criminal proceedings anymore and they have settled their dispute amicably, it would not be useful for referring the applicant to Court to face the trial and it would amount to a futile exercise. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, nothing remains to be decided in the present matter.

9.

Accordingly, compounding application (IA/2/2024) is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 107 of 2021 State Vs. Shoaib, under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC, pending in the Court of learned Principle Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Haridwar, is hereby quashed. Resultantly, the challani report/charge-sheet dated 16.11.2020, stands quashed.

10.

Accordingly, the present C482 application is disposed of in terms of the compromise.

11.

Interim order dated 17.06.2022 stands vacated.