High CourtsSingle Bench

Shobha Rani vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 28 January 2021 · Citation: (2021) 01 P&H CK 0429

HON’BLE JUDGES
Avneesh Jhingan, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Preconception And Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation & Prevention Of Misuse) Act, 1994 — Section 3A, 3B, 5, 6, 23, 25 · Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 — Section 15 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 120B, 420
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 2926 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 387 words

Avneesh Jhingan, J

The matter is taken up for hearing through video conference due to COVID-19 situation.

This is a petition seeking regular bail in FIR No. 120 dated 24.12.2020, under Sections 3-A, 3-B, 5-6, 23, 25 Rule 3A(1) Pre-conception and Pre-Natal

Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation & Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 and 420, 120-B IPC, and 15 (2) of Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, Police

Station Daba, Ludhiana.          Â

A complaint was received from Chairman, District Operative Authority-cum-Civil Surgeon, Ludhiana. A raid was conducted at Shobha Nursing Care

ST No. 1/4 Guru Nanak Nagar, Daba Lohara Road at Ludhiana. A decoy patient, namely, Paramjit Kaur having 16 weeks pregnancy was taken to

the nursing home, Shobha Rani demanded Rs.35,000/- for conducting gender test. After receiving the amount, an outside person was called to conduct

the gender test. The serial numbers of currency notes given to Shobha Rani were noted down by Hisar Team. On having suspicion, the person who

came to the nursing home for conducting the test fled away leaving behind the Ultra Sound machine and white colour Creta car bearing registration

No. PB-10HE-5219.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not the main accused. She is not owner of nursing home and she is just a midwife. The

test was to be conducted by the Doctor and she is in custody since 24.12.2020.

Learned state counsel vehemently opposes the prayer for bail. She submits that the petitioner is the owner of the Nursing Home. She was

apprehended at the spot. She was the one who demanded money from decoy person, in other words, she was caught red handed as amount paid was

recovered from her.

The allegations against the petitioner are serious. The case is with regard to pre-natal sex determination. It was on an information received that raid

was conducted by sending decoy customers. The petitioner negotiated with the decoy customer and called a outside person for scanning and he came

in Creta car along with the ultrasound machine. As per instructions of learned State counsel challan is yet to be produced and the matter is being

investigated.

Considering the allegations, deep probe is to be inquired into to unearth the truth, no case is made out for grant of bail.

Dismissed.