AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
12 paragraphs · 368 wordsAlok Kumar Verma, J
Supplementary affidavit, filed by the applicants, is taken on record.
Present Bail Application has been filed for grant of regular bail in connection with the Case Crime No.01 of 2023 (Sessions Trial No.106 of 2023), registered at Revenue Police Station Patwari, Chhetra Masak, Tehsil Chakrata/ Police Station Kalsi, District Dehradun.
Applicants are in judicial custody under Sections 363, 366A, 376D, 504 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
Heard Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. M.A. Khan, learned AGA for the State.
As per the First Information Report, lodged by the father of the victim, victim was missing since 30.05.2023.
Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate, contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present matter. They are innocent persons. Applicant no.1 is a permanent resident of District Dehradun and the applicant no.2 is a permanent resident of District Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, therefore, there is no possibility of their absconding. They have no criminal history.
Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate, further contended that as per the statement of the alleged victim (PW1), her date of birth is 11.02.2005. She has not supported the case of the prosecution. She has turned hostile, and, applicants are in custody since 30.05.2023.
Mr. M.A. Khan, learned counsel for the State has opposed the bail application. However, he has fairly conceded that the applicants have no criminal history and the victim (PW1) did not support the case of the prosecution.
Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no reason to keep the applicants behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merit of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicants deserve bail at this stage.
The Bail Application is allowed.
Let the applicants – Shokeen and Shahrukh be released on bail on their executing personal bonds and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned
