High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 06 J&K CK 0015

Showkat Ali Bijran and Others vs State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 1 June 2010 · Citation: (2010) 2 JKJ 629

HON’BLE JUDGES
Muzaffar Hussain Attar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
CMP No. 1528 of 2010 in Service Writ Petition (SWP) No. 604 of 2007

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 350 words

Muzaffar Hussain Attar, J.—In this application, learned Counsel for applicant seeks correction of the record of this Court as contained in

order dated 22.03.2010. Learned Counsel further submitted that because of the communication gap between him and his clients, he made

statement that matter is being prosecuted only for Petitioner No. 1 and accordingly it was ordered that petition shall stand dismissed in respect of

Petitioners 2 and 3. Learned Counsel submitted that as a matter of fact, Petitioners 1 and 3 have already been absorbed in service and petition

survives for Petitioner No. 2 only. Learned Counsel, thus, submitted that in order to do justice in the case and keep the record straight he has filed

this application with the prayer that it be ordered that the main writ petition is surviving for Petitioner No. 2 only.

2.

Heard learned Counsel for applicant. Considered the matter.

3.

The mistake which has crept in the order dated 22.03.2010 is not attributable to the Petitioner. This Court, being court of record, has to correct

the mistakes. When such an instance is brought to the notice of the Court, it casts duty on the Court to correct the mistake in order to keep the

record straight, as record of the High Court is being rolled in perpetuity and correct record therefore is to be maintained. This duty is traceable to

section 94 of the Constitution of J&K read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India.

4.

In view of the submissions made by the learned Counsel for Petitioner, it becomes imperative to correct the record of this Court as reflected in

order dated 22.03.2010. Accordingly, order providing for dismissal of the writ petition so far as it pertains to Petitioner No. 2 is recalled. The

main writ petition shall survive only for Petitioner No. 2 and shall stand dismissed for Petitioners 1 and 3. Registry to update the index of the writ

petition, accordingly. CMP disposed of.

SWP No. 604/2007

4.

Learned Counsel for Petitioner seeks and is granted week's time to take steps for effecting service upon Respondents. List thereafter.