High CourtsDivision Bench(2000) 07 KAR CK 0005

Shri Raghunath Bharamanath Patil vs Smt. Monakka Raghunath Patil

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 17 July 2000 · Citation: (2000) 4 KCCR 2411

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.N. Vallinayagam, J · Hari Nath Tilhari, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous First Appeal No. 573 of 1994

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 139 words

Hari Nath Tilhari, J.—In view of Section 19(2) of the Family Courts Act which reads as under:

Section 19(1) ...

Section 19(2): No appeal shall lie from a decree or order passed by the family court with the consent of the parties or from the order passed under Chapter IX of Code of Criminal Procedure.

(This amendment has been introduced by Act No. 59 of 1991).

This appeal is misconceived.

2.

This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Family Court on 30th March, 1993 on an application u/s 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure. Section 125 of Code of Criminal Procedure is contained in Chapter IX of Code of Criminal Procedure.

3.

In view of Section 19(2), the present appeal is misconceived and is not maintainable. As such this appeal is hereby dismissed as not maintainable.