High CourtsDivision Bench(1928) 02 CAL CK 0011

Shriram and Mahadeo a firm of merchants vs Mukh Ram Agarwala

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 16 February 1928 · Citation: 110 Ind. Cas. 432

HON’BLE JUDGES
Cammiade, J · B.B. Ghose, J

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 133 words

The appeal is not properly constituted as the plaint was brought by three persons as members of a firm and the decree was made in their favour. The appeal to the lower Appellate Court was against one of the members of the firm. It was not properly constituted there. But the objection does not appear to have been taken and the lower Appellate Court dismissed the appeal on the merits. Here the defendant has appealed making only one of the members of the firm as respondent. The appeal is infructuous, for even if a decree in favour of the person who is made respondent here is set aside the other plaintiff s would be entitled to execute the decree to its full extent.

The appeal, therefore, is dismissed as improperly constituted with costs.