AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
8 paragraphs · 178 wordsAmit Borkar, J
Heard.
Rule.
By this Writ Petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner is seeking release of husband of petitioner on emergency parole.
On going through the petition and reply filed by the respondent No.3, it appears that the application for release of the husband of the petitioner on emergency parole is still pending with the respondent No.2.
Ms N. R. Tripathi, learned A.P. P. for the respondents/ State makes a statement that she has instructions that the respondent No.2 shall decide the application of the petitioner for release the husband of the petitioner within seven days from today.
In view of the said statement, nothing remain survives to be adjudicated in the present petition. The present petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the application of the petitioner for release the husband of the petitioner on emergency parole, within seven days from today.
Rule is made absolute in the above terms. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
