High CourtsSingle Bench

Shyam @ Ghanshyam vs State

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 12 May 2022 · Citation: (2022) 05 RAJ CK 0045

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Garg, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 307, 380, 395, 447, 457, 458 · Arms Act, 1959 — Section 3, 25
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4377 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 173 words

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.263/2021 Police Station Bap, District Jodhpur for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 307, 447, 458, 395 of IPC and under Section 3/25 of Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application filed by the petitioner.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

I have considered the arguments advanced before me and gone through the material available on record.

As many as eleven cases were registered against the petitioner, therefore, no case for grant of bail is made out. Hence, the present bail application filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed at this stage.