High CourtsSingle Bench

Shyamal Pal vs Dr. Bholanath Sharma And Others

Sikkim High Court · Decided on 21 April 2026 · Citation: (2026) 04 SIK CK 1627

HON’BLE JUDGES
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal From Judgment And Decree In Suit No. 02 Of 2026
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 128 words

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J

Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Government Advocate, enters appearance for the Respondents No.3 and 4.

Mr. N. Rai, Learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Tara Devi Chettri, Learned Counsel enters appearance for the Respondent No.5.

Mr. Sushant Subba, Learned Counsel enters appearance for the Respondent No.7 today and undertakes to file Vakalatnama during the course of the day.

Respondent No.6 is absent.

Registry reports that Notice issued to him is returned with the report unserved.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks to serve Notice on Respondent No.6 by "dasti".

Requisites be filed within three days.

Registry to take steps thereafter.

Learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks to file better Affidavit to I.A. No.01 of 2026.

Not opposed.

Let better Affidavit be filed.

List on 29-05-2026.