AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
4 paragraphs · 92 wordsB.K. Shrivastava, Member (J)
1.
None for applicant.
Shri R.K. Srivastava, counsel for respondents.
2.
As per Registry report dated 05.04.2023, the notice sent to the applicant has been received unserved with the remark that the applicant was not found upon the given address The address was mentioned as it is from the OA. Therefore, it appears that the service upon the applicant is not possible. He is not residing at the address given in the OA. Therefore, in the absence of applicant the OA No.142 of 2011 is dismissed in default.