High CourtsDivision Bench

Sib Chunder Mullick vs Kissen Dyal Opadhya and Another

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 31 August 1876 · Citation: (1876) ILR (Cal) 477

HON’BLE JUDGES
Richard Garth, C.J · Macpherson, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 — Section 42
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 123 words

Richard Garth, C.J.—We are of opinion that a Court of Small Causes, constituted under Act IX of 1850, can, during the same day, and at the same sitting of the Court, ex parte restore a cause once struck out u/s 42, though the order for striking off may have been duly recorded.

2.

It is always, of course, open to the defendant in such a case to apply to the Court upon sufficient grounds to set aside the ex parte order; and the sufficiency of such grounds would in each case be a question for the discretion of the Judge.

3.

The sum of Rs. 230, which has been brought into Court by the plaintiff in this case, will be refunded to him.