High CourtsDivision Bench

SIDCUL Solution Network And Another vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 1 June 2026 · Citation: (2026) 06 UK CK 0034

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ · Subhash Upadhyay, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 321 Of 2023
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 89 words

Manoj Kumar Gupta, CJ

1.

Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners very fairly concedes that the Writ Petition has become virtually infructuous, as the period of contract was three years, and the same would come to an end in three months.

2.

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, in case any fresh tender is issued, it shall be open to the petitioners to participate in the said tender process.

3.

All pending applications stand disposed of accordingly.