AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
17 paragraphs · 363 wordsThis Crl.M.C is filed challenging Annexure B order of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nadapuram through which the petitioner's request for
release of passport and permission to go abroad was rejected by that Court.
It is noticed that the petitioner was released on bail by the order marked as Annexure A of this Court, whereby this Court had imposed a condition
that the passport shall be surrendered and further that the petitioner shall not leave India without permission of the Court.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has a genuine reason to go abroad as he is conducting a business at Qatar and his
presence is required there. He also submits that the trial of the case is not likely to take place in the near future.
I have heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.
The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the petitioner is involved in other cases as well and therefore, it would not be in the interest of justice to
allow the request of the petitioner.
In the over all facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that if the presence of the petitioner can be ensured by imposing any other
condition and if the request of the petitioner is genuine, the petitioner need not be restrained from going abroad especially in the light of the fact that
the trial of the case is not likely to commence in the near future. Therefore, I set aside Annexure B order directing the Judicial Magistrate of the First
Class, Nadapuram to re-consider the matter. The petitioner shall produce such material as may be necessary to show that his request for going abroad
is genuine and for bonafide purpose. The learned Magistrate shall on being convinced of the genuineness of the request of the petitioner pass orders
permitting the petitioner to go abroad after releasing his passport for such time as may be deemed appropriate by the learned Magistrate and imposing
such condition as may be necessary to ensure the presence of the petitioner at the trial of the case.
This Crl.M.C. is disposed of with the above said directions.
