High CourtsSingle Bench

Sikandar @ Dildhar Momin And Anr. vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 9 May 2018 · Citation: (2018) 05 CHH CK 0086

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. SAM KOSHY, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
MISC. CRIMINAL CASE NO. 2567 OF 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 447 words
1.

This is the first bail application seeking for grant of bail to the Applicants who are in jail since 08.03.2018 in connection with Crime No. 31 of 2018

registered at Police Station Lailunga, Distt. Raigarh, for the offence punishable under Section 306/34 IPC.

2.

As per prosecution case, the applicants together with other co-accused persons is said to have subjected the deceased Shabina to ill treatment,

torture and cruelty which led her to commit suicide by consuming poison on 18.12.2017.

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that marriage between the deceased and their son namely Hakim Momin took place in October, 2017.

There has been no complaint whatsoever or a case has been lodged against the applicants. Even if the statement of witnesses recorded during the

course of investigation is taken in to consideration, it would reveal that the ingredients necessary to make out an offence under Section 306 IPC are

not available. Further, the nature of allegations levelled against the applicants are also omnibus and general in nature. There is no specific instance or

date of ill treatment made by the applicants. Thus, prayed for grant of bail.

4.

The State counsel referring to statements of parents of deceased as well as other relatives submits that the applicants and their son Hakim Momin,

the main accused, have been subjecting the deceased to ill treatment, torture and cruelty on account of demand of dowry. So also the Husband Hakim

Memon used to consume liquor and assault the deceased which led her to commit suicide on 18.12.2017.

5.

Having heard the contentions put forth on either side and on perusal of case diary, indisputably the nature of allegations shows that there have been

some allegation of demand of dowry, ill treatment and torture, but there does not appear to be any strong material available to show that the

ingredients necessary to make out an offence of abetment which is required to constitute the offence under Section 306 IPC available. There was no

act attributed on the part of the present applicants immediately before the deceased commits suicide. There is no material to establish abetment or

instigation on the part of the present applicants which led the deceased to commit suicide. Thus, this Court is of the opinion that the present is a fit

case where the Applicants can be enlarged on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is directed that the Applicants shall be released on bail on their furnishing personal bond

for a sum of Rs.20,000/- each with one surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for their appearance as and when

directed.