High CourtsSingle Bench

Sikkim Behara vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 25 September 2018 · Citation: (2018) 09 CHH CK 0364

HON’BLE JUDGES
P. Sam Koshy, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 — Section 20(B)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Criminal Case (MCRC) No. 6165 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 392 words

P. Sam Koshy, J

1.

This is first bail application seeking for grant of bail to the Applicant who is in jail since 16.01.2018 in connection with Crime No.17 of 2018

registered at Police Station Bodhghat, Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar for the offence punishable under Section 20-B of the NDPS Act.

2.

As per prosecution case, the applicant and other co-accused namely Gopal Saha were found in possession of 2 KG and 4 KG of Ganja respectively

at Railway Station, Jagdalpur (CG).

3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the allegation against co-accused Gopal Saha is also same and that co-accused has already been

granted bail by this court on 26.06.2018 in M.Cr.C. No.3470 of 2018 and thus, prayed that the present applicant may also be granted bail on the

ground of parity as the case of the present applicant is better as compared to the case of co-accused in as much as the contraband seized from the

applicant is much less then what was found in possession of the co-accused. The applicant has remained in custody for more than nine months. He

further submits that the case of the applicant be also considered on the ground of delay in trial as except for framing charges no evidence on behalf of

the prosecution has been recorded till date.

4.

The State counsel on the contrary opposes the bail application on the ground that it is a case of NDPS Act and the applicant was found in

possession of 2 KG of Ganja.

5.

Without commenting on merits, considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case particularly taking note of the fact that trial itself

has not been progressed except for framing charges; the co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court; the allegations are the

similar; there is no past antecedent of the applicant and also considering the period of custody undergone, this Court is of the opinion that the present is

a fit case where the Applicant can be enlarged on bail.

6.

Accordingly, the application for grant of bail is allowed. It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond

for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court for his appearance as and when directed.