High CourtsSingle Bench

Sitaram And Others vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 6 November 2020 · Citation: (2020) 11 MP CK 0040

HON’BLE JUDGES
J. P. Gupta, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 389(1) · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 394
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 8122 Of 2019
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 349 words

J. P. Gupta, J

Heard on I.A.No.9589/2020 which is Fifth application filed by the appellant / accused under section 389 (1) of Cr.P.C. for suspension of his jail sentence awarded by the Court of 1st Additional Session Judge, Bhopal in ST No.81/09 vide its judgment dated 10.10.2018 convicting the appellant / accused under section 394 of the IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for 5 years along with fine of Rs.2000/-with default stipulation as mentioned in the impugned judgment. Earlier applications were dismissed as withdrawn.

It is submitted that the appellant has completed half period of his jail sentence and disposal of the appeal will take time. During trial the appellant was on bail. There is no likelihood of his absconding. He is sanguine to succeed in the appeal. If the sentence is not suspended, his right to file appeal will be futile. Hence, prayer is made for suspension of his jail sentence and grant of bail.

Learned PL has opposed the application and prayed for its rejection.

Having considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and looking to the other facts and circumstances of the case, this application is allowed. It is ordered that subject to payment of fine amount, if not already deposited, execution of jail sentence of the appellant Sitaram shall remain suspended during the pendency of this appeal and he be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.40,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for securing his appearance before the trial court on 22.12.2020 and thereafter on all other such subsequent dates as may be fixed by the trial court in this regard.

In case, the appellant is found absent on any date fixed by the trial court then the said court shall be free to issue and execute warrant of arrest without referring the matter to this Court, provided the Registry of this Court is kept informed.

The appeal be listed for final hearing in due course as per listing policy.

C.C. as per rules.