Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Siti Networks Ltd vs Dhanush Cable Network And Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 23 August 2021 · Citation: (2021) 08 TDSAT CK 0123

HON’BLE JUDGES
Biresh Kumar, Registrar
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition Nos. 669, 671, 686, 692 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 151 words

It was submitted by Mr. Aditya Krishna that on the last occasion, two weeks time for filing Vakalatnama was given but it could not be filed and, thus,

undertakes to file his Vakalatnama during the course of the day with the Registry. The prayer is allowed. The Registry is directed to accept the

Vakalatnama, if filed during the course of the day. He is granted further two weeks time for filing reply. The matter proceeds ex-parte against

Respondent No.1 in B.P.Nos.669 and 686 of 2020.

The reply has been filed on behalf of the Respondent No.2 by Mr. Sarad Kumar Sunny. Ms. Prakriti Nambiar appears on behalf of the Petitioner and

prays for four weeks time for filing a Rejoinder to the reply filed by Respondent No.2. The prayer is allowed. The Petitioner may file the Rejoinder

within four weeks from now. List the matter on 24th September, 2021 for directions.Â