Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench

Siti Networks Ltd vs Robin Cable Network And Anr

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 18 November 2021 · Citation: (2021) 11 TDSAT CK 0040

HON’BLE JUDGES
Shiva Kirti Singh, Chairperson · Subodh Kumar Gupta, Member
CASE NUMBER
Broadcasting Petition No. 571 Of 2021 With Misc Application 401 Of 2021
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 161 words

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.  As prayed, she may file affidavit of service within one week.  According to her the respondents have been served with notices between 6th and 28th October, 2021.

Most of the respondents have appeared through different counsels, except respondent no. 1 in B.P. Nos. 593 of 2021.  Mr. Nikhil Mittal, Advocate has appeared for respondent no. 1 in B.P. Nos. 571 and 588 of 2021 in which Mr. Vibhav Srivastava has appeared for respondent no. 2.  Mr. Mukul Sharma, Advocate has appeared for respondent no. 1 and 2 both in B.P Nos. 589,590, 591 and 592 of 2021.  Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate has appeared for respondent no. 2 in B.P. No. 593 of 2021.  Learned counsels are granted one week's time for filing Vakalatnama and four weeks for reply/appropriate applications.  Rejoinder/reply to M.As. if any, may be field on behalf of the petitioner/non-applicants  before the next date.

Post the matter under the same head on 21.12.2021.