High CourtsSingle Bench

Sk. Imtiaz Ali vs State of Odisha

Orissa High Court · Decided on 18 January 2016 · Citation: (2016) 121 CutLT 631

HON’BLE JUDGES
B.K. Nayak, J.
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 205
RESULT
Disposed off
CASE NUMBER
CRLMC No. 5016 of 2015
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 337 words

B.K. Nayak, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel.

2.

In this CRLMC application, learned counsel for the petitioner challenges the order dated 02.12.2015 passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Bhadrak in I.C.C. Case No. 300 of 2015 rejecting the petitioner''s application filed under Section 205, Cr.P.C.

3.

Mr. Das, Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working under CESU at Cuttack and it is not possible on his part to attend the trial Court on each and every date and besides that the offences are very minor in nature. The impugned order reveals that though in the petition it was stated that the petitioner was a Government servant, no material was produced before the Learned S.D.J.M., Bhadrak for which the Learned S.D.J.M. stated in the order that no plausible and reasonable evidence was produced by the petitioner to substantiate his prayer to dispense with his personal attendance.

4.

It is trite that personal appearance of an accused in a criminal trial is the rule and exemption from personal appearance is the exception which can be restored to in a suitable case in exercise of sound judicial discretion. But where the offence involved is grievous in nature prescribing considerable length of substantial sentence, the Court while exercising discretion shall take into consideration the totality of the circumstances of the case. Whether the discretion should be exercised or not, no hard and fast rule can be prescribed. However, power can be liberally exercised in favour of Purdanashin ladies, old, infirm persons and busy public functionaries depending on the nature of gravidity of the offence.

5.

Considering the grounds on which the Learned S.D.J.M., Bhadrak has rejected the application under Section 205, Cr.P.C., I dispose of the Criminal Misc. Case with the direction that in case the petitioner files a fresh application under Section 205, Cr.P.C. and produces adequate materials, the Learned S.D.J.M., Bhadrak shall consider the same afresh.

6.

CRLMC is accordingly disposed of.

7.

Issue urgent certified copy.