Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench

Skynet Digital Service Pvt Ltd vs Information Tv Pvt Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 17 April 2023 · Citation: (2023) 04 TDSAT CK 0024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ram Krishna Gautam, Member
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 9 Rule 7
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Misc Application No. 76 Of 2023 In Broadcasting Petition No. 105 Of 2018
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 137 words

Learned Counsel for both side are present. An application under Order 9 Rule 7 has been filed. The ground of absence has been said to be owing to ailment. Pleadings were said to complete and file was scheduled for hearing.

This is being opposed by Counsel for other side. But the above fact is not being opposed that file was fixed for final hearing and pleadings wee complete.

Having heard and gone through and considering the principles of Natural Justice, this application merits to be allowed with cost. This application is being allowed on cost of Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One Thousand only).  Order for proceeding ex-parte is thereby recalled, on the payment of above cost to the other side.

List the matter 'for final hearing' on 12.07.2023.

Date previously fixed on 03.05.2023, has been rescheduled as above.