High CourtsSingle Bench

SMT. KIRAN CHELAK vs SMT. USHA BAI

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 5 March 2018 · Citation: (2018) 03 CHH CK 0108

HON’BLE JUDGES
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) No. 584 of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 127 words
1.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that petitioner may be allowed to prefer revision before Commissioner against the order

of the Collector, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara passed on 24.01.2018.

2.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3.

The prayer appears to be fair and reasonable and the same is allowed.

4.

Be that as it may, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer revision before the Commissioner within two weeks from today that will be considered

and decided by the Commissioner on its own merits expeditiously.

5.

Certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the counsel for the petitioner on furnishing attested photo copy thereof.

6.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost(s).