High CourtsSingle Bench

Smt. Madhu Saxena vs State Of Uttarakhand & Others

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 26 November 2018 · Citation: (2018) 11 UK CK 0216

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 2134 Of 2018

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 316 words

Sudhanshu Dhulia, J.

1.

The petitioner is working as a Senior Assistant in the office of Minor Irrigation Division, Dehradun since 2006. Now she has been transferred from Dehradun to Tehri vide order dated 07.06.2018. Hence, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition before this Court.

2.

The case of the petitioner is that she is 56 years of age and therefore comes under the definition of a "senior employee" under the Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public Servant Act, 2017 and the senior employee cannot be transferred from a "sugam area" to a "durgam area". This may be so, but the petitioner has not been able to show anything before this Court, which may suggest that the petitioner has been transferred from "sugam" to "durgam" area as there is nothing to show on record where the petitioner has been transferred (i.e. Tehri) is a "durgam area".

3.

Another contention of the petitioner is that there can be no transfer under the aforesaid Act from "sugam" to another "sugam area". This contention is also not accepted as there is nothing in the Transfer Act which bars the State Government or the competent authority to transfer an employee under the particular given contingency from "sugam" to another "sugam area" or from "durgam" to another "durgam area". Although categories of transfer which are being given are generally from "sugam" to "durgam" and vice-versa and the third category is transfer on the personal request, but there is no bar for the competent authority to transfer an employee from "sugam" to another "sugam area". Therefore the contention of the petitioner fails.

4.

In view of the above, the writ petition fails and it is hereby dismissed. The petitioner shall join her duties within 15 days from today, failing which the State Authorities would be at liberty to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner.

5.

Interim order dated 11.07.2018 stands vacated.