High CourtsDivision Bench

Smt. Pooran Devi @ Bakunthi Devi And Others vs State of U.P. And Others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 13 January 2012 · Citation: (2012) 01 AHC CK 0190

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vinay Kumar Mathur, J · Devendra Pratap Singh, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 — Section 3, 4 · Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 323, 498A, 504
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. - 525 of 2012
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 463 words
1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Government Advocate. This writ petition has been filed for quashing of an FIR in case crime No. 925 of 2011 under sections 498A, 323, 504 I.P.C and section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Etmadaula, District Agra.

2.

The writ court is not competent to go into questions of facts and on the allegations, it cannot be said that no prima facie case is disclosed.

3.

Hence, the FIR cannot be quashed by this Court at this stage.

4.

However, in view of the contention of the counsel for the petitioners that dispute can be settled amicably between the parties and the petitioners are ready to deposit expenses for the mediation, it is provided that if the petitioners deposit Rs. 7000/ before District Legal Services Authority, Agra out of which Rs. 5000/ shall be given to Smt. Girjesh @ Poonam on her appearance before the mediating agency and appears before the Magistrate concerned within three weeks from today, the magistrate concerned shall release the petitioners on interim bail on their furnishing personal bonds. After releasing the petitioners on interim bail, the magistrate concerned shall himself or through any agency existing for mediation/conciliation or counseling in the district send the matter for mediation/conciliation or counseling and in case the matter is amicably resolved in the said proceedings, the Investigating Agency and the court concerned may take a decision as to whether final report may be submitted or appropriate orders be passed in the criminal proceedings. The mediating agency shall inform the factum of success or failure of the mediation within one week of conclusion of the mediation/conciliation proceedings. In case the matter could not be resolved in the mediation proceedings, the court concerned may consider the matter of final bail on merits in accordance with law.

5.

The mediation proceedings should be concluded within a period not exceeding three months from the date of initiation of the proceedings. However, if for any unforeseeable reason it become imperative to seek extension of time for concluding the mediation proceedings, the concerned Magistrate shall be empowered to grant such extension of time as he deems fit and proper.

6.

For a period of three weeks from today or till the petitioners appear/ surrender before the court below and apply for bail (whichever is earlier), the petitioners shall not be arrested in the aforesaid case crime.

7.

It is made clear that if the petitioners fails to appear before the court concerned for the purpose of applying for bail within the time allowed or fails to deposit the sum as directed above, the relief given by this order shall not apply and no further extension of time will be given. With the aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed off.