High CourtsSingle Bench

Sneha Babu vs Vinay P V

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 6 February 2023 · Citation: (2023) 02 KL CK 0054

HON’BLE JUDGES
C.S.Dias, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Section 24
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Transfer Petition (C) No. 652 Of 2022
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 451 words

C.S.Dias, J

1.

The transfer petition is filed under Sec.24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking to transfer OP No.1251/2022 (Annexure-1) from the Family Court, Irinjalakkuda to the Family Court, Thrissur.

2.

The petitioner’s case, in brief, in the memorandum of transfer petition is that, she is the wife of the respondent. They have a two year old child born in the wedlock. The petitioner and the child are residing in her parental home in Thrissur. The respondent has committed domestic violence on the petitioner. The petitioner has filed MC No.34/2022 (Annexure -2) before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Thrissur, against the respondent, invoking the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The respondent is contesting Annexure-2 before the jurisdictional Magistrate. Therefore, no inconvenience would be caused to him in Annexure-1 being transferred to the Family Court, Thrissur. Hence, the transfer petition.

3.

Heard; Sri.Saijo Hassan, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri.V.M Krishnakumar, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

4.

The law with respect to  transfer of proceedings, particularly matrimonial disputes, is no longer res-integra, in view of the categoric declaration of law by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Sumitha Sing V. Kumar Sanjay and another [2002 KHC 1889], Mona Aresh Goel V. Aresh Satya Goel [2000 KHC 1835], Vaishali Shridhar Jagtap V. Shridhar Vishwanath Jagtap [2016 KHC 6489], Santhini V. Vijaya Venkatesh [2017 (5) KHC 48] and N.C.V Aishwarya vs. A.S Saravana Karthik Sha [2022 (5) KHC 182]. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that it is the convenience of the woman and children that has to be looked into, while ordering the transfer of a case from one Court to another.

5.

In the light of the law laid down in the afore-cited decisions, the pleadings and materials on record, the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, particularly the fact that the petitioner and the two year old child are residing within the jurisdiction of the Family Court, Thrissur and that the respondent is contesting Annexure-2 before the jurisdictional Magistrate, I am inclined to exercise the discretionary powers of this Court under Sec.24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and order the transfer of Annexure-1 to the Family Court, Thrissur.

In the result, I allow the transfer petition as follows:

(i) OP No.1251/2022 is transferred from the Family Court, Irinjalakkuda, to the Family Court, Thrissur.

(ii) The Registry shall forward a copy of this order to the Family Court, Irinjalakkuda, with instructions to forthwith transmit the records in Annexure-1 to the Family Court, Thrissur.

(iii) The Family Court, Thrissur, shall, immediately on receipt of the records in Annexure-1, issue notice to the parties for their appearance.