High CourtsSingle Bench

Sohan Lal vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 1 March 2021 · Citation: (2021) 03 P&H CK 0009

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sant Parkash, J
ACTS & SECTIONS REFERRED
Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 439 · Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 302, 324, 506
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 38226 Of 2020
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

24 paragraphs · 483 words

Sant Parkash J

(The aforesaid presence is being recorded through video conferencing since the proceedings are being conducted in virtual court)

The instant petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.37 dated 25.08.2016, under

Sections 302, 324, 506 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station City Banga, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar.

According to the FIR, 24.08.2016, at about 9:30 a.m., Madan Lal and Charanjit Singh @ Bagga had approached the complainant and his brothers at

their shop for glasses to consume liquor, which was refused by them and it led to an argument. Thereafter, both of them started hurling brick bats on

the complainant party. The father of the complainant got injured and he was taken to the hospital, where Madan Lal and Charanjit Singh @ Bagga

along with their co-accused came there armed with various weapons. The fight took place resulting in death of one Kamaljit Kumar. The petitioner is

alleged to have given datar blow on the back of Sucha Singh and on the arm of Kamaljit Kumar (deceased).

Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that it is a cross-version case and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. The

injury attributed to the petitioner was not fatal and cannot be said to be the cause of death of Kamaljit Kumar. Moreover, the main accused namely,

Charanjit Kumar @ Bagga @ Charanjeev Kumar and Madan Lal, have already been granted the concession of regular bail by this Court passed in

CRM-M-30653-2018 vide order dated 26.07.2018 (Annexure P-1) and CRM-M-46395-2018 vide order dated 26.10.2018 (Annexure P-2)

respectively. The petitioner is in custody for last more than 3 years.

On the other hand, learned State counsel does not dispute the aforesaid facts.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and with their kind assistance, have gone through the record of case.

As per the prosecution, the petitioner inflicted datar blow on the back of Sucha Singh and on the arm of Kamaljit Kumar, which were not grievous in

nature and cannot be said to be the cause of death of Kamaljit Kumar. Moreover, the main accused namely, Charanjit Kumar @ Bagga @

Charanjeev Kumar and Madan Lal have already been granted the concession of regular bail.

Keeping in view the totality of facts & circumstances of the present case and the fact that since the trial of the case will take long time, no useful

purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody further, since he is already behind bars for the last more than 03 years; including the fact

that main accused have already been granted the concession of regular bail, the present petition is allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court/Chief Judicial

Magistrate/Duty Magistrate concerned.