AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
41 paragraphs · 392 wordsAccused-appellant has laid this appeal under Section 14A(2)
of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of
Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ''Act of 1989'') to assail impugned
order dated 28.08.2017 passed by Special Court, SC/ST
(Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Udaipur (for short, ''learned trial
Court''). By the order impugned, learned trial Court has rejected
the bail application of appellant in respect of FIR No.36/2017 of
Police Station Sayra, District Udaipur for offences under Sections
143, 149, 341, 323, 324, 427, 392, 308 IPC and Section 4 / 25 of
the Arms Act.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellant has
been falsely implicated in the matter and the allegations contained in the FIR are inherently improbable. Learned counsel for the
appellant further submits that co-accused Kailash, Shravan,
Mukesh, Govind and Suresh have been enlarged on bail while
considering their bail application No.5445/2017 vide order dated
22.06.2017 and Purna Shaker and Govind have been enlarged on
bail while considering their bail application No.4652/2017 vide
order dated 01.06.2017 and the case of present petitioner is not
distinguishable from the co-accused. Lastly, learned counsel has
submitted that all these aspects have not at all been examined by
the learned trial Court while rejecting the bail application of
appellant.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the appeal and
submits that looking to the gravity and magnitude of offences
attributed to the appellant, no interference with the impugned
order is warranted. Learned Public Prosecutor further submits that
the learned trial Court, in its discretion, has declined the prayer
for bail to the appellant which is not liable to be tinkered with in
exercise of appellate jurisdiction.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into
account all the facts and circumstances of the case, I feel
persuaded to set aside the impugned order.
Accordingly, the instant appeal is allowed, the impugned
order passed by learned trial Court is set aside and it is ordered
that accused-appellant, Sohan S/o Shri Sayar, arrested in
connection with F.I.R. No.36/2017 Police Station Sayra, District
Udaipur, may be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal
bond of Rs.50,000/- with two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- each to
the satisfaction of learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear
before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called
upon to do so.
