AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
16 paragraphs · 312 wordsThis application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.12/2020, Police Station
Sarada, District Udaipur for the offence under Section 4/21 of M.M.D.R. Act and Section 379 of IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has deposited the compounding amount calculated by the competent authorities. He
further submits that there is no case of like nature is pending/decided against the present petitioner. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be
enlarged on bail.
The learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the
arguments advanced, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the present bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Som Raj
S/o Banshi Lal Meena, in connection with F.I.R. No.12/2020, Police Station Sarada, District Udaipur, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided
he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees: Fifty Thousand Only) along with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees: Twenty Five
Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-
(I) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as
to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and
(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
