High CourtsSingle Bench

Sonika vs State Of Haryana And Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 February 2020 · Citation: (2020) 02 P&H CK 0178

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 6821 Of 2019 (O&M)
Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

No AI summary yet

Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 185 words

Tejinder Singh Dhindsa, J

CM-2403-CWP-2020

1.

Prayer in the application is for withdrawal of the main writ petition.

2.

Notice in the application.

3.

On the asking of the Court, Mr. Kiran Pal Singh, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice. Copy of the application already stands furnished.

4.

In the light of the prayer made in the application and by recording a no objection from counsel opposite the date in the main writ petition is preponed

from 24.04.2020 and the same is taken up on Board today itself.

5.

Application disposed of.

Main case

6.

Petitioner filed the instant writ petition seeking a mandamus for directing the respondents to grant to her the benefit of Child Care Leave so as to

take care of her minor daughter who was stated to be suffering from a health ailment.

7.

Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that since the period for which Child Care Leave was being sought has already been

worked out, he has instructions not to pursue the instant writ petition.

8.

As per statement suffered, writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.