AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
5 paragraphs · 274 wordsGurvinder Singh Gill, J
Petitioner No.1 – Sonu aged about 29 years and petitioner No.2 –Kamaldeep Kaur aged about 29 years, who is stated to be wife of respondent No.4 - Sanjiv Kumar, both of whom are in a ‘live-in’ relationship, seek issuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of respondent Nos.4 and 5, who do not approve of their ‘live-in’ relationship.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting anything as regards the veracity of the averments made in the petition and also as regards the sanctity of alleged relationship of the petitioners, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 – Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar to look into the matter and to dispose off the representation dated 5.4.2023 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
A copy of this order alongwith copy of the representation dated 5.4.2023 (Annexure P-3) be sent to respondent No.2 – Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.
It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged relationship of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.