High CourtsSingle Bench

Sonu and Satendra Kumar vs State of Uttarakhand and Shri Amar Chand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 September 2011 · Citation: (2011) 09 UK CK 0129

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prafulla C. Pant, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Writ Petition No. 829 of 2011

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 179 words

Prafulla C. Pant, J.—Heard.

2.

By means of this writ petition moved under Article 226 of Constitution of India, the Petitioners have sought quashing of the First Information Report No. 265 of 2011, relating to offences punishable u/s 323, 452, 504 Indian Penal Code, Police Station Ranipur, District Haridwar.

3.

Factual pleas of defence are raised in the writ petition as to the innocence of the Petitioner. It is pleaded that they were not named in the FIR. It is also pleaded that Rs. 15,000/- were paid by the complainant to the co-accused Sonu, and in order to avoid the demand of said money the FIR is lodged.

4.

In its writ jurisdiction, this Court is not inclined to examine the factual aspects which are subject matter of investigation.

5.

Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed summarily with the observation that if the Petitioners Sonu, S/o Tularam and Satendra Kumar S/o Amarpal Singh surrender before the court concerned their bail application shall be heard, and disposed of without unreasonable delay. (Stay application No. 10019 of 2011, stands disposed of).