AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
No AI summary yet
Generate an eight-section analysis of this judgment — facts, issues, reasoning, ratio and a plain-language gist.
Judgment
18 paragraphs · 351 wordsAmol Rattan Singh, J
All cases listed today have been taken up for hearing by way of video conferencing because of the situation existing due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
By this petition, the petitioner seeks the concession of 'regular bail' under the provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C., upon FIR No.360, dated 07.07.2019,
having been registered at Police Station Meham, District Rohtak, alleging therein the commission of offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506
of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, firstly, submits that though the victim was only alleged to be 16 years old as per the FIR, even as per the report
under Section 173 Cr.P.C., she was more than 20 years of age on the date of alleged occurrence.
Upon query to Mr. Chahar, learned DAG, Haryana, he naturally does not deny that fact and further submits, upon query of this court (on account of
the fact that there was a break in the online communication with learned counsel for the petitioner in between), that the girl, in her first statement
under Section 164 Cr.P.C., had stated that she had left home of her own accord but thereafter, on another complaint having been made by her mother
on August, 2019 (after three weeks), her second statement under the same provision was recorded, in which she stated that she had been gang raped
by four persons but in the investigation conducted, three persons were found to be innocent on the basis of their mobile phone locations, with therefore
only the petitioner arraigned as an accused in the said report.
The petitioner is stated to have been in custody since August 4, 2019.
Keeping in view the aforesaid period of custody as also the discrepancy in the statements of the alleged victim, before a Magistrate on each occasion,
without making any comment on the actual merits of the case, it is considered appropriate to admit the petitioner to bail.
Consequently, upon him furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial court, the petitioner is ordered to be admitted to bail
during the period of the trial.
